The Reactions of Violence

By Matthew Schafer

Copyright 2008, All Rights Reserved

In the martial arts there are many myths, legends, exaggerations, and downright lies. Being considered somewhat of an expert in martial arts I get asked a lot of questions about the "death touch", knocking people out with chi from across the room, breaking a razor sharp spear with your throat, and many other things that people have seen in the movies or nowadays on youtube. One myth that never seems to be resolved is that of body reactions.

Years back I attended a two day seminar where a bunch of instructors each came and gave their own presentations. On the evening of the second day there was a Kenpo instructor who taught his seminar entitled "Playing Pool With Your Attacker". It was fairly well attended and quite interesting but nearly ended in a fistfight. The premise of this man's lecture was one I've heard many times before, that you could hit certain areas of the body and your attacker would always respond by moving in certain ways. The general idea is this: an attacker throws a punch so you block it and counter by punching him in the ribs; when punched in the ribs people always respond by turning and bending so when they do you have another strike waiting there for him which makes him do another predictable movement, and then that goes on and on until your attacker in neutralized, thus controlling your attacker like you would balls on a pool table.

The seminar went nearly as I had expected. This man talked about his principles and about half of the people in attendance rolled their eyes; he then gave demonstrations and some people made faces while a few other's left the room; he began explaining the science of this manner of combat and then someone shouted, "That's bullshit! People don't move like that when you hit him because..." A couple people in the audience raised their voice and the instructor calmly explained things again, then some people started to get angry because they lacked the necessary social skills and the seminar ended abruptly and everyone left.
This whole topic is yet another example of the fact that martial artists are over-trained and under-educated. Quick story to illustrate my point: years back I was asked to give a seminar on knife defenses at a local taekwondo school. I taught them a few basic movements and then had them work the knife attacks and defenses into their one-step sparring techniques and everyone was having a good time. At some point someone brought up one of my biggest martial art pet peeves...striking the back of the neck. I stopped everyone and asked them if they knew what happened when they struck someone in the back of the neck and a few hands went up. They gave answers like "cause pain", "make him light headed", and "knock him out". I replied, "NO! If you hit someone in the back of the neck chances are you'll either paralyze them for the rest of their life or you'll kill them". At that the room went silent. Why is it that people get excited about punching and kicking people but they freak out when you talk about the realities of those punches and kicks?

Go up to nearly any martial arts student, or instructor for that matter, and ask them about punching someone in the solar plexus and they'll talk about stances, turning your hip, rotating the fist, finding the target, breathing, and other colored belt level basics but cannot answer further. What follows is a summary of a conversation I've had with nearly a hundred martial artists:

Me: "What happens when you hit someone in the solar plexus?"
Them: "It knocks the wind out of them."

Me: "How does it do that?"
Them: "Uh...."

Me: "When you traumatize the solar plexus what process occurs in the body?"
Them: "Uh..."

Me: "Is the solar plexus an actual body part? I mean is there a solar plexus organ under there or something?"
Them: "Well....you're hitting the lungs aren't you?"

Me: "A lot of people consider hitting the solar plexus to be a safe strike but did you know that it can traumatize the abdominal aorta? Did you know that that can lead to cardiac arrest or an unsafe drop in blood pressure which can potentially be fatal, especially if they have heart problems?"
Them: "Really? What's the abdominal aorta?"

Me: "Did you have any idea that hitting someone in the solar plexus could possibly kill them?"
Them: "No, I had no idea. We're just told to hit someone there and knock the wind out of them."

Me: "You train to hit people in targets like the solar plexus, chin, groin, and neck so don't you think it would be a good idea if you understood exactly what these strikes do to the human body?"
Them: "That makes sense but we never go over that in class."

Me: "What do you go over?"
Them: "Right now we're going over forms and getting ready for our next testing."

It baffles me but martial artist are some of the most over-trained and under-educated people on the planet. They spend years perfecting their jump-spin-hook-kick but ask them what the difference is, in terms of injury, in hitting the high versus the low cervical vertebrae and they have no clue. All the stuff that doesn't really matter is the stuff that martial artists spend their lifetimes perfecting but all the stuff that is incredibly important, like understanding what does and what doesn't kill someone, is rarely given 10 minutes.

Today there are lots of martial artists in jail for killing someone by accident. The story that always comes to mind is one that was published in Black Belt Magazine in the 80's. The article about a Korean guy who was a black belt in Tang Soo Do and one day got in a fight and he defeated his attacker by chopping him in the back of the neck. At first the guy was happy and felt like a total "Barney-Bad-Ass" having knocked his attacker out so easily, however he felt quite different when he was arrested and later convicted of murder. His defense...he had no idea that striking someone in the back of the neck could kill him. Or what about the instance that happened in Texas in the late 70's, where a guy who happened to be a brown belt in Judo got mugged on his way home from work by a "drunk biker". The guy came at him and he blocked the guy's attack and then executed a hip throw which slammed his attacker on the ground and left him unconscious. He served seven years in jail for manslaughter. He had no idea that a hip throw could kill someone.

This is where the myths, legends, and reputation of the marital arts work against us. If someone attacks you and you hit them and they end up dying, good luck trying to explain to the jury that you had no idea that the technique you used was potentially fatal. The people on the jury panel have seen movies and watched "Walker: Texas Ranger" so when they hear that you train in martial arts they will think that you are an expert in destroying the human body. You can't look at a jury and say, "Yes, I'm a black belt in karate...but I did not intend to kill that man when I kicked him in the head. I had no idea that that could be fatal" and have the jury believe it.

Looking at a jury member and saying that you have been studying karate for 10 years and you have a 3rd degree black belt but you had no idea that hitting someone in the chin could cause a broken neck and leave the individual paralyzed or dead, is like a car mechanic saying that they've worked on cars for 10 years but had no idea that putting oil in your gas tank is bad for your car; in either case they'll look at you and say, "bullshit".

I'm not saying that you have to have a medical degree, but being a martial artist without a functional knowledge of anatomy and how trauma affects the body is like being a mechanic and not knowing how an engine works.

Back to reactions, the fact that people don't understand how the body moves in response to trauma is a perfect example of the over-trained and under-educated statement I just made. Let's examine the issue of bodily reactions and shed some light onto it; the idea that if you hit someone "here" they always move this way and if you hit someone "there" they always move that way is about 5% truth and 95% bullshit...in the general context that is. When you hit the body there are two processes that occur and manifest in visible bodily reactions, and they are a "mechanical reaction" and a "reflex reaction".

A mechanical reaction is incredibly simple to understand...it is just an object reacting to having a force applied to it. For example, if you give someone a little push you'll cause them to take a step back, and if you punch them then they should be knocked back further because you're delivering more energy in a more concentrated manner. A mechanical reaction is just one person moving in response to a force being applied to them.

The first important element in understanding a mechanical reaction is understanding that a human being is not a punching bag. If you push a punching bag it will just swing away from you because it has a very limited ability to move. Human beings can step forewords, backwards, and to the side as well as rotate 360 degrees in either direction; human beings can also rotate their bodies in both directions around their spine, curl and bend their backs, and bend at the hips. When you push a punching bag it will just swing away from you in one unit, but when you push a person backwards, or punch them, they will generally move in separate units; they will move away from you and if they can they will rotate, curl, and bend.

This leads to something known as "quartering the body". Since people rotate around their spines, if you push someone on the right side of their centerline they will move back and rotate to the right, and do the opposite if you push them on the left side of their centerline. Since people curl forwards and backwards at their lower back, if you push someone above their lower back (at their sternum) they will move backwards and bend backwards, and if you push someone right on their lower back (between their hips and sternum) they will move back and curl forewords. Since people bend at their hips, if you push them in the sternum or above it will cause then to move backwards and bend slightly backwards, and if you push them below their hips (their pelvis or legs) they will move back and bend forewords. As for anywhere above the shoulders you just move with the force in the direction of the force. These are just the simple mechanics of the body that you can validate for yourself all you want.

Since we've just gone over the above we can tell how people will move depending on where we push them. If I push someone in the solar plexus I know that they will move backwards (since I've applied force to them) and since I'm pushing them in their lower back I know that they will curl forwards. If I push someone on their right peck I know that they'll step backwards and rotate to the right. If I take my foot, place it on someone's left leg, and then push their leg back I know that their leg will go back, they'll rotate to the left (because their left leg is on the left side of their spine), and then they'll bend forwards since their leg is below their hips. If I push someone's head their body will just move in whatever direction I push them.

This isn't really complicated stuff, it's actually very simple: when you push someone you'll make them step back and they'll bend, curl, and rotate if they have the opportunity because that's just how the body is designed to move. It's easy to understand and 100% predictable; I know that if I push someone under the chin that they'll lean backwards and that if push someone in the stomach that they'll curl forwards...not complicated stuff.

The second important element of mechanical reactions is the simple fact that the harder you push someone the more energy you are applying and therefore the further they'll move. If you give someone a little push you might make them lean away from you or take a small step back, but if you take a big step into them and shove them as hard as you can you'll most likely make them stumble back 8-10 feet and then perhaps fall to the ground.

When explained mechanical reactions are pretty easy to understand but people still say, "Well, I've been fighting for years and I've never seen people move in a predictable way". Well...you'll notice that I've talked about pushing people and not about hitting people. When you push someone you shove them backwards with your body, you essentially push force through them. However, when most people punch someone they punch "to" them and not "through" them. If I'm standing 4 feet away from someone and then I swing my arm in and hit him in the solar plexus I'm applying very little force to him and I'm going to get a very small mechanical reaction from him; but if I step into him and use my bodyweight to drive my fist into his solar plexus I'm going to knock him back. Why? Because I'm hitting him harder.

Basically, if you hit someone lightly you'll get a small mechanical reaction (you'll only displace them a little bit) but if you hit someone forcefully and drive through them you’ll get a bigger mechanical reaction (you'll displace them a lot). If you want to get big predictable mechanical reactions out of people you can't be throwing a punch and pulling it back quickly, you have to step in, throw it hard, drive through them, and let them move away from your fist instead of the other way around.

Next you have reflex reactions. If you grab a hot pan you immediately pull your hand back, grab it with your other hand, and then look at it to assess the damage. This is an involuntary reaction that is a product of your autonomic nervous system that is designed to protect your body by making it move involuntarily away from trauma. If you step on a nail you don't say, "Oh crap, I just stepped on a nail. I better pull my foot up", you immediately jerk your foot up and then you realize that you stepped on something sharp.

The important thing to realize is that these reflexes happen involuntarily and without the brain. The signal goes from your foot, in this case, up your spinal cord to a sensor in your spine, to the rest of your body to get it to move, and then to your brain to let you know what happened. The only way that you can get around this reaction is if you know that something is coming and you mentally prepare yourself for it. If you know that a pan is hot you can grab it and hold onto it as long as you're able and if you know that a kick to the groin is coming you can take it, provided that it doesn't exceed your pain tolerance. In a real violent situation, however, you won't know what’s coming and when (which is why the "Iron Shirt" technique or other techniques designed to let you take a strike are fairly useless. If you know that something is coming and you have the ability to prepare yourself for the impact then why not take that time to...I don't know...block it or step in and crush the guy's throat?).

Another important thing is that while you are going through a reflex reaction you are helpless. So if I take my thumb and jam it into an attacker's eyeball he'll first give me a mechanical reaction and then a reflex reaction and he'll be helpless while he is doing so. Therefore, once I have caused an injury to him I'll have a few second window that is open to me where I can injure him again at will.

Reflex reactions are again fairly easy to understand. If part of your body receives a trauma that is sufficient in strength your body will execute an involuntary reaction that will jerk the injured area away, cover it with your hands, and then you'll look at it to assess the damage.

To wrap this up, if you hit or push someone you WILL get a mechanical reaction that is in relation to the amount of force that you put into them. If you stand 4 feet away and swing your arm in you probably won't get much of a reaction, but if you step into him as deeply as possible and drive your body through him you can potentially knock him out of his shoes. I've actually had a partner hold a pad for me and by stepping in and driving my punch through with my bodyweight I've actually picked him up off the ground. The harder you hit the bigger the mechanical reaction you'll cause your attacker to make.

Then, if you hit him and you sufficiently injure or break something you'll cause him to do a reflex reaction which creates a short window of time where they are 100% helpless. Put these things together then yes, you can make someone move in a 100% predictable way when you hit them, but to get it you have to drive through them and hit target, not just a general area of their body.

So the whole issue of being able to predict how someone will move when you hit them is valid, but people don't see the reactions in the "real world" because: 1.) They don't understand the difference between sport martial arts and "surviving a violent encounter" martial arts, 2.) They don't hit with enough power or they don't know how to hit with bodyweight, 3.) They do hit with enough power but they don't understand the difference between generating force and transferring that force into the target, and 4.) They hit general areas of their attacker's body instead of going after specific targets.

The way "reactions" are generally done in the martial art world they're about 95% bullshit, but when you understand what I've written here you should be able to predict the way people will move when you hit them. That being said...all this reaction stuff is overrated. If someone is trying to stab you to death with a knife then your goal isn't to predict this or to predict that, your goal is to severely injure the other guy so he is unable to continue his attack. Self-defense/martial arts/fighting is all about causing injures to your attacker which will cause his body to shut down and to be physically unable to continue his attack and anything else is of lesser importance.

The Proper Steps to Self-Defense

By Matthew Schafer

Copyright 2008, All Rights Reserved

When it comes to learning self-defense many people just jump right in without really knowing what they need to learn or even what needs to be accomplished in order for them to be able to defend themselves if need be.

If you’re interested in learning to defend yourself then there are six basic steps you need to take.

1) The first and foremost step you have to take is to make the conscious decision to take responsibility for your own safety. Until you make that decision and accept that commitment you won't be truly mentally prepared. If you don’t make the conscious decision then you won’t be committed to any course of action and when you are attacked you’ll tend to just freeze because you’re brain, not having been given a plan for this situation, doesn’t know what course of action to take.

2) The second step is to educate yourself. You need to learn who is most likely to attack you and how they will do it. You need to learn what makes people attack, how criminals think, how they commit their crimes, how they choose their victims, how to spot them, what to do if you spot them, and how to stop them just to name a few.

3) The third step is to learn awareness techniques that will allow you to spot potential criminals. This can't be stressed enough: if you're not being aware of your surroundings and looking for criminals you most likely won't spot them and then you’ll be taken by surprise and there will be very little anyone can do for you.

4) The fourth step is that you need to learn techniques for de-escalating potentially violent situations like arguments and aggressive confrontations. About 80% of all assaults happen during or just after arguments so if you can de-escalate them you remove about 80% of your threats right there. If you don't know these things you most likely won't have the opportunity to use any self-defense technique let alone a weapon like a gun.

5) The fifth step to take a reliable course in self-defense. To be really rounded out you need to be able to defend yourself from basic grabs, holds, punches, kicks, knives, clubs, firearms, and multiple attackers, but any amount of learning will help you survive. An attacker isn't going to stand back, put their arms up, and fight you like a boxer; instead they will most likely rush you and be on you like an angry pit-bull repeatedly overwhelming you with punches, pushes, and foul language. When this happens you need to have the ability to use your own body and bodyweight to cause severe and debilitating injuries to them.

At a minimum these are the 5 steps you need to take. If you’re really serious about learning to defend yourself you can also take the next steps as well.

6) An additional sixth step that you can take is to learn to use “improvised weapons”. Improvised weapons are ordinary items that can be used to cause injuries; these include books, bags, ink pens, magazines, hairspray, keys, combs, dirt and sand, and pretty much any other item. For the ordinary citizen knowing how to use improvised weapons is far more important than traditional weapons because, as stated in what we refer to as the "rule of thumb", you only use what is already in your hands at the time you attacked to defend yourself, and you are far more likely to have these items in your hands when violence happens to you. Unless you're well trained and prepared you probably won't have pepper spray in your hands, and there is a very small chance that someone will attack you while you're holding a gun, but you just may have an ink pen in your hand.

7) An additional seventh step you can take it to learn to use “personal weapons”. Personal weapons are ready made devices designed and sold for the purpose of self-defense. These items include pepper spray, tactical flashlights, stun guns, retractable batons, personal alarms, knives, and others. I suggest learning to use these before you learn to use guns because there are a lot of places that you can't take guns but you can take pepper spray. You can't take a gun on a plane or into various foreign countries but you can take an ink pen or a tactical flashlight (a tactical flashlight is a small flashlight that shoots a high intensity light that blinds an individual and gives you the opportunity to run away or close distance to them and cause injuries). Most states have laws against various personal weapons so you need to check with your individual state, but simple improvised weapons are legal everywhere.

8) An additional eighth step that you can take is to learn to use firearms. Guns are great tools but they are not the ultimate self-defense tool. Shooting can be a lot of fun and I believe that it is a great experience as well as an effective means of defending yourself. If you are interested in buying a gun please read the article entitled "Can't I Just Buy A Gun?" (http://www.self-defense-lessons.com/cantijustbuyagun.htm) to read more about this topic.

The Seven Keys To Situational Awareness

By Matthew Schafer
Copyright 2008, All Rights Reserved

When you are out and about in today’s society you need to stay aware of your surroundings, but that is easier said than done. People often wonder exactly how to be aware, so this article addresses these seven keys components to keeping aware and staying safe.

Key No. 1: The Two Second Rule. The two second rule can be one of the biggest lifesavers out there. Most people blindly walk right into areas without looking first checking to see if it is safe and as a result they are easy prey for a criminal. The way this rule works is simple: anytime you approach a new area stop and spend two seconds looking at it first to make sure it is safe. In the morning before you walk out to your driveway stop and take to seconds; before approaching your car, before getting into your car, before pulling into a parking spot, before getting out of your car, before entering a room, before approaching your house when you come home at the end of the day, etc.

Any time you approach a new area stop before you enter it and take two seconds to look around and make sure it is safe first. As you look around you want to ask yourself three questions:

1.) What IS here?
2.) What shouldn't be here or doesn't NEED to be here, and
3.) Where are the exits?

Just ask yourself these questions and your mind will answer them for you. Especially asking yourself what doesn't need to be there often makes potential threats pop out. All in all you might add another 5 minutes to your day but it is definitely work it.

Key No. 2: Keep Your Head on a Swivel. This is a common saying in the security, law enforcement, and military communities. What it means is that wherever you are keep looking around to see what is around you. You don't have to make big dramatic movements or look like you're paranoid, but every couple of minutes look around you 360 degrees and see what is there. Ask yourself the same three questions:

1.) What IS here?
2.) What shouldn't be here or doesn't NEED to be here, and
3.) Where are the exits?

When you do this make sure to make use of reflective surfaces because sometimes they'll show you something you might not be able to see otherwise. In addition to letting you know who and what is around you this is also the best deterrent you can do to potential attackers and criminals who are scouting for their next victim. A lot people talk about making sure you appear confident because that deters attackers, and that is true to some extent, but what the criminal element really doesn't want is to deal with someone who is going out of his way to be aware of their surroundings. Chances are that person is too alert to sneak up on so it is too hard to take them by surprise and if someone is that alert they might have some kind of training or be armed where the criminal could get hurt. Getting injured is the what the criminal fears the most, much more than being caught and going to prison.

Key No. 3: The Five Foot Rule. The Five Foot Rule simply states that you want to do your best to keep at least five feet in between you and all potential threats. The reason is that someone who is closer than 5 feet can generally attack you faster than you can effectively react to stop them, while a person 5 feet away from you and further needs to make bigger movements so they are easier to see, you detect their attack quicker, and you have more time to respond than if they were closer. In addition, if you have someone confront you that is agitated or you believe may be a threat, giving him extra space will help to calm him down and keep him from feeling threatened.

Key No. 4: Hand Awareness. If a person is going to attack you most likely they will do so by using their hands so it is important to see where their hands are. Are their hands behind their back? Are they in their pockets? Is only one hand in their pocket while the other dangles freely? If so they may be hiding a weapon. As they approach you did one of their hands go into a pocket? If so they might be grabbing a weapon. As they approach you do their hands suddenly move in towards their body? If so they might be getting ready to attack you. Are their hands clenched in fists? If so they may be planning on striking you. Is one hand cupped and that arm held rigidly by their side? Or, is only one arm held rigidly by their side while the other swings freely? If so that is a good indication they are holding a weapon in that hand. Do they tap or caress a certain part of their body every few minutes almost like it’s a nervous tick? If so they most likely have a weapon hidden there and they checking to make sure it is still there, usually without them realizing that they're doing it.

If you do see someone that you believe has a weapon and for whatever reason you have to physically confront them or take them down, you should approach them from behind as to not be seen and then attack them from their right side. The reason for this, and the reason this is standard training for the Secret Service, is that people tend to be right handed therefore there is a good chance that if they go for their weapon they will do so with their right hand. By attacking from their right side you can immediately control their right arm and keep them from accessing their weapon or at least limit their ability to use it.

Key No. 5: Arm's Length Awareness. An attacker needs to be close enough to reach you in order for their attack to be successful. That being so, it is often when an approaching person reaches arm's distance from you (roughly 3.5 feet) that they launch their attack and throw that sucker punch. In addition to trying to keep 5 feet of distance, or more, between you and a potential threat, be aware of people as they break that invisible barrier or arm's length distance. If you see someone approaching you and something doesn't look right move away to put more distance between the two of you. In order for them to continue their attack they will have to follow you and give themselves away. If they keep on coming then just as they reach arm's length distance they will most likely attack. If you know they are going to attack it is usually best to attack them first, just as they are about to reach arm's length you should step towards them and attack.

Key No. 6: Peripheral Awareness. To get the most out of situational awareness you need to use both your focus vision (your direct line of sight) and peripheral vision (outside of your direct line of sight). Focus vision is used to identify objects but it is not very good at detecting movement, and peripheral vision is really good at detecting movement but not the best of identifying objects. When you are watching someone's hands or look at their behavior you should look directly at their hands and other parts of their body. However, in order to attack you they will have to move towards you and it is your peripheral vision that will do that for you.

Look directly at a person's center and your peripheral vision will pick up all the movements of their arms and legs. If you're walking down the street or sitting in a restaurant relax your eyes to let your peripheral vision work and scan the area, you'll find that everyone's movements jump out. Often criminals work in teams so it you are busy speaking with someone who is asking for directions or that you don't know make sure you keep 5 feet of space between you so you can see their entire body and have the increased reaction time, and turn to the side so you can scan see 360 degrees around you before you give him directions or look at your watch to give them the time. If you have to be engaged in a longer conversation look around every couple of minutes and use your peripheral vision to scan for movement.

If you entering a room it can be very easy to get tunnel vision and not see an attack from the side as you enter. Often the person looks through the doorway get focuses on an object they see inside the room and stays focused on that object to the extent they never see someone waiting to abuse them. The way to combat this as you look through the doorway see the floor line where the floor meets the far wall, and look a few inches above it. Then turn your focus away from your direct line of sight and to your peripheral vision. As you enter the room your eyes will automatically pick up movement on both sides of you to help you detect an ambush.

Key No. 7: Sucker Punch Awareness. Sucker Punch Awareness is essential knowing the warning signs of a sucker punch. There are four key times when a person will throw a sucker punch. The first time is when they approach you and they reach arm's length distance from you. As they pass that threshold they tend to want to start their attack.

The second time a person is likely to sucker punch you is when they get overly angry. If someone confronts you and gets in your face you should try to back away and keep the 5 feet of distance between the two of you. If that is not possible pay attention to these key areas that are signs that they are getting ready to start an attack:

-Their face gets red and they look like they are going to explode
-They suddenly widen their eyes
-They suddenly narrow their eyes
-They suddenly drop their chin
-They suddenly raise their shoulders
-They suddenly bring their elbows either away from their body or into their body
-They make fists
-They suddenly hold their breath

The third time when are likely to sucker punch you is when they are engaging you verbally and then suddenly disengage. Often they will stop talking and turn to the side like they are either thinking or talking to someone else, and then when they turn back they will throw a punch. They may also turn completely around showing you their back, or they might go from yelling at you to laughing and talking to one of their friends. The reason for this is to catch you off guard; if they threw the punch while they were in your face you might be ready for it, but if they disengage you might think that they were calming down and drop your guard.

The fourth time they are likely to sucker punch you is when they are trying to distract you. The way this often works is that if someone is in your face they will tell you to look at something else or bring your attention away from them and the hit you when you're not looking. Another common method is for a criminal to walk up to you and try to distract you with conversation while they get close enough to you to attack you. They will often walk up and ask you what time it is, and then when you look away to check your watch they attack; they might ask you for directions and when you turn to point them in the right direction they attack. They may also ask for a cigarette or for you to light their cigarette. They may also just ask you a complicated question to get you to look away in thought and then attack you then. Again it is imperative that when you are approached by someone you don’t' know to make sure you keep them at least at 5 feet away and then turn to the side while keeping an eye on them and then scan the area, 360 degreed, for an accomplice before dealing with them. Also pay attention to where their hands are and what they're doing when they approach you.

The Case For Studying Self-Defense

By Matthew Schafer

Copyright 2008, All Rights Reserved

The other day I did some grocery shopping right after teaching a self-defense class, and while I was inspecting some apples I noticed the woman standing next to me make an odd face. I looked up to see a woman in perhaps her late fifties staring at my school logo which was printed at my shirt. With a still scrunched up face she said, "What...do you teach karate or something?" I then explained to her that I taught self-defense classes for a living, and her response was to roll her eyes, sigh, and comment that she didn't know why people wasted their money on "that" kind of thing because we live in a safe town and if there is a problem the police are only a phone call away.

"We live in a county with five different police agencies so it is beyond me why someone would give you one cent", she said. I replied, "You're right, but I'd suppose that you venture out of the county from time to time. Perhaps go on vacations..." "We have cell phones now", she snapped, "If someone needed help you could call from anyplace". I just smiled and replied, "Well, it seems that I'm a practitioner of a useless profession" and I then walked away (which reminds me that I still need to buy apples).

You can't really argue with people who are committed to a fantasy, and the idea that the police will be there whenever we need them is just that. Let's clear something up right now, the police are a great and valuable service provided to us by our government, but the average response time for the police from the time you call 911 is usually around 10 to 15 minutes, but it can even be up to 30 minutes or more. If a police officer happens to be in the area he or she might be able to be there in only 10 minutes but the thing is that most violent crimes are committed in less than a minute with most taking only a few seconds.

It may surprise you to know that today 70% of bank robbers get away. That's right 70%! How? Since police response times are generally around 10-15 minutes from the time the silent alarm is sounded, bank robbers just make sure that they're in and out of the bank in anywhere from 3-6 minutes. They go in, rob the bank, run out, and by the time the police show up the robbers are just another car driving down the road possibly miles away. Getting away with robbing a bank is all about beating the police's response time.

If some low-life who's walking down the street spots you, decides that the money in your wallet is just what he needs to finance his drug habit, and then starts walking over to you, do you honestly think that the police are going to show up in time to protect you from him. Chances are that he will confront you, accost you, and run away before you even realize exactly what's going on, let alone have the time or even the chance to dial 911.

If all you have to do is pick up the phone and dial 911 and the police will show up and save the day, then how do you explain the fact that in America a woman is sexually assaulted every two and a half minutes?

Consider this unfortunate story: On March 16th, 1975, three women were living in a townhouse in Washington DC. It was late at night and they were sound asleep when they were awakened by the sound of their back door being kicked in by three men. Two of the men quickly found one of the women in bed on the second floor and began to beat and violate her. The two other women hid on the third floor, called 911, and then went out the window onto the roof to hide. After a while they saw a police car slowly drive past their house but it never stopped, so the women bravely went back into the house where they again called the police and then went back out onto the roof.

After a half hour the women didn't hear anything from inside the house so they assumed that the police had arrived without them noticing or that the intruders had left so they went back inside to find their friend believing that they were safe. However, the intruders were waiting for them and all three women were viciously beaten and rapped...for 14 horrible hours.

Luckily all three women survived and they sued the Washington DC Police Department. The case lasted for years and the last appeal was ruled on in 1981 when the DC Court of Appeals said: "The duty to provide public services is owed to the public at large and, absent a special relationship between the police and an individual, no specific legal duty exists". In plain english what this means is the police can't be everywhere at once and they have no actual legal duty to help you.

Think about that for a minute, while we have some extremely fine men and women on the police forces in our country, they actually have no legal duty to help you. Even if the police do show up when you need them there is no guarantee that they can protect you. They may show up and tell you that legally there is nothing they can do, or they may end up being victims themselves. There have been numerous cases around the country where police have responded to an emergency and ended up being shot, killed, taken hostage, or had other horrible things happen to them.

Bottom line, you and you alone are responsible for your own safety. It is your job to keep yourself safe and protect yourself and your family from criminals, and it’s the job of the police to show up usually afterwards and arrest the bad guys. Once the criminals are arrested you then hope that they go to jail and stay there because after being arrested most criminals are booked, arraigned, make bail, and are back out on the street just a few hours later.

Crimes happen fast and if you don't know how to protect yourself then there really isn't a whole lot the police can do for you. It is imperative that people learn how to defend themselves because the truth is when a criminal attacks it really is just you and him. If you know how to defend yourself then there is a good chance that you can walk out of the incident safe and unharmed, but if you don't know how to defend yourself then you really have to rely on the hope that the criminal is satisfied with only taking your money.

Should I Run Out And Buy A Gun?

By Matthew Schafer

Copyright 2008, All Rights Reserved

I get a lot of questions from people about whether or not they should buy a gun for self-defense, and I also get asked every now and then why gun owners should take self-defense classes because, after all, they have guns. My answer to these people is that I believe that guns are great tools, I am a big believer in owning a gun, and I own guns myself, however, buying a gun doesn't mean that you no longer have to train in basic self-defense skills.

Often people want to use guns as an excuse to get out of training. Some people believe that guns are the most effective form of self-defense so if you own one you don't have to waist time with "lesser" methods such as hand-to-hand combat. The truth is that this form of reasoning is extremely flawed and incredibly dangerous.

A gun is an absolutely great self-defense tool but it is only a tool. What determines whether someone can use a gun to effectively defend themselves in a violent situation is first and foremost the individual's level of training and competency with the weapon. Even then the gun just serves as an extension of the individual's training and preparation. It is always the individual that succeeds or fails, or in this case lives or dies, and not the tool that they have in their hand.

Gun enthusiasts tend to not agree with my point of view, but I, a gun enthusiast myself, believe that they focus too much on their tool. Some people actively train with and carry their guns for the purpose of self-defense and believe that that alone will keep them safe and while I have nothing but respect for these people I firmly believe that they are not any safer than an unarmed self-defense practitioner. The reason for this is that focusing on any self-defense tool is missing the point of self-defense entirely.

The point of self-defense is to first notice and avoid potential danger, second to de-escalate and escape danger, and third to neutralize attackers through bodily injury. If someone attacks you, you want to take as much force as you can possibly get, drive that force through the weakest areas of their body, and then repeat as necessary. This will result in the temporary or permanent destruction of a bodily function or structure which will cause the attacker to be physically unable to continue their attack. When you are attacked it doesn't matter how all this is accomplished, it only matters that it is accomplished. It matters not whether the thing that generates the force and drives it into the vulnerable areas of their body is a fist, foot, baseball bat, rock, golf club, axe, a gun, a rifle, a grenade, etc. It doesn't matter what punctures a lung or blows out a knee, all that matters is that the lung gets punctured or that the knee gets blown out, after all the lung or knee won't know the difference between the various methods of delivery.

The reason that guns are a great self-defense tool is firstly because they create fear and hesitation in the other individual, and secondly, and far more importantly, they have the ability to punch holes through the person's body which can result in a wide variety of bodily dysfunctions, impairments, structural failures, and possibly death. Add to that that guns can do this from a far greater range then you can with other weapons and they can do it effectively and fairly dependably. However, as great and effective as guns are you can get the same, or comparable, results with other non-projectile weapons such as your body. When a bullet enters someone's body it can puncture organs, fracture bones, tear nerves and cartilage, or rip joints but you can get the same result yourself by throwing someone down and stomping on them. The only difference is that the bullet can do it faster, with less effort, and from a greater distance.

The main problem with focusing on any weapon or self-defense device, whether it be a gun, knife, pepper spray, alarm, whistle, or any other, can be found in what we refer to as the "rule of thumb". The rule of thumb states that when you are attacked you use whatever is in your hands at the time to defend yourself. If you have a cell phone in your hand you can use your cell phone, if you have your car keys in your hands you can use your keys, and if your hands are empty you use your bare hands. It also means that if a weapon isn't in your hands when a violent situation starts you should forget about using it, at least for the time being. How many people have been beaten, raped, or killed because an attacker confronted them and instead of just defending themselves from the attack they spent their time trying to get at a weapon that they had in their pocket or purse? If you have pepper spray in your hand and you're attacked then by all means use your pepper spray, but if you have pepper spray in your pocket and you're attacked you should forget about your pepper spray and just defend yourself. Violence happens extremely fast and you can't waist time by trying to get at the gun that is on your hip, if you do then you could be unconscious or fatally injured by the time you have it half way out of the holster.

People who are really into weapons usually brainwash themselves into believing that they need their weapon in order to be dangerous or effective in a self-defense situation. You need to remember that self-defense is all about causing injuries and although labor saving devices are nice, you don't need any weapon other than your body to cause them. Think about it, if you have a gun in a holster on your hip covered by two layers of clothing and someone comes up to you, cocks their right fist, and throws a punch at you, does it make more sense to try to pull up your clothing, grab your gun, pull it out of the holster, disengage the safety, point it at your target, pull the trigger, and then hope the gun goes off (it very well may jam or under duress you may not have disengaged the safety or chambered a round), hope the bullet hits the attacker, and hope that the attacker stops his attack when he gets shot, or to simply forget about the gun, step in and hit your attacker in the chin with your palm which will knock him back and could very well knock him out, and then when you have a moment or two to think, get your gun out?

If someone attacks you and you don't have a weapon already in your hand, you should forget about it. Criminals attack in such a manner that you can't waist time messing around with a weapon. When a criminal attacks they use the same method employed by police SWAT teams and special operations units. That method is called "Speed, Surprise, and Violence of Action". A soldier or SWAT team member can talk to you at length about this method and while a criminal most likely will not be able to give you the terms, they can definitely talk to you about the general process. Both the police officer, soldier, and criminal try to strike their target with such speed that their target won't have time to react, with surprise so their target will not have the ability to prepare of plan, and with such violence that the target will go into a defensive state of shock and not have the ability to react. This method has proven to be so effective and reliable that it is used by every tactical unit in the world. This being so, you can see why when you're attacked you don't have time to dick around trying to grab a tool.

Interestingly, when it comes to combat in close quarters many special operations units teach, and I agree totally with this, that it is much easier to take your opponent's weapon and use it on them than it is to use your own weapon. For example, if you were going through a building with your handgun and you turned a corner and suddenly you were standing next to an attacker who also had his gun out, would it make more sense for both of you to start shooting and let bullets fly everywhere, or to just move into your attacker and control his weapon, take it away, and shoot him with it? If both of you were to start shooting then both of you could end up dead. Plus, in such close quarters it is actually very hard, even for experienced soldiers, to place a shot on their opponent that can stop them. Unless the bullet fractures a bone, tears a joint, or hits a nerve it won't instantly stop someone, even if you shoot someone in the heart and their heart explodes they will still have about 15 seconds left of conscious and controlled movement. Personally even though I own a gun I don't carry it because if I want to shoot my attacker I'll take their gun away and shoot them with that.

So to gun owners I tell them that they need to train in basic self-defense skills because there is a very good chance that they won't be able to get to their guns under duress, after all police officers are heavily trained to use their guns, they wear them out in the open so they don't have any clothes encumbering themselves from getting at them, and they use quick release holsters to aid in their ability to get their guns quickly, and yet officers are killed all the time with their guns still in their holsters.

To people who are interested in buying a gun for self-defense I tell them to sit down and decide whether or not they can actually shoot someone. If they feel that they can't or if they're not sure I tell then I wouldn't recommend it. If you have a gun but don't have the mental ability to pull the trigger and take someone's life when you need to then the only thing that will happen is that the criminal will now have a brand new gun and you'll be far worse off. If they can honestly say that they can pull the trigger when they need to, I then tell them that as long as they realize the weapons limitations, receive training in combat shooting, and actively practice with it, it is a great tool. Then I warn them about focusing on it too much and feeling overconfident because they have it, after all just because you have a gun doesn't mean that your attacker can't take it away from you and use it on you.

If you're interested in learning to defend yourself don't rush out and buying a gun. To truly be able to defend yourself you have to be more than a one-trick-pony. If you are interested in defending yourself the first and foremost thing you have to do is make the conscious decision to take responsibility for your own safety. Until you make that decision and accept that commitment you won't be truly mentally prepared.

The next step is to educate yourself. You need to learn who is most likely to attack you and how they will do it. You need to learn what makes people attack, how criminals think, how they commit their crimes, how they choose their victims, how to spot them, what to do if you spot them, and how to stop them just to name a few. After you learn that you need to learn awareness techniques that will allow you to spot potential criminals. This can't be stressed enough: if you're not being aware of your surroundings and looking for criminals you most likely won't spot them and there will be very little anyone can do for you.

After that you need to learn techniques for de-escalating potentially violent situations like arguments and aggressive confrontations. About 80% of all assaults happen during or just after arguments so if you can de-escalate them you remove about 80% of your threats right there. If you don't know these things you most likely won't have the opportunity to use any self-defense technique let alone your shiny new gun (to this end I would highly recommend getting the book Surviving Violence which teaches you all these things. To get it go to www.myspace.com/selfprotection).

Next you need to take a reliable course in self-defense. To be really rounded out you need to be able to defend yourself from basic grabs, holds, punches, kicks, knives, clubs, firearms, and multiple attackers, but any amount of learning will help you survive. An attacker isn't going to stand back, put their arms up, and fight you like a boxer; instead they will most likely rush you and be on you like an angry pit-bull repeatedly overwhelming you with punches, pushes, and foul language. When this happens you need to have the ability to use your own body and bodyweight to cause severe and debilitating injuries to them.

After that you need to learn to use improvised weapons. Improvised weapons are ordinary items that can be used to cause injuries; these include books, bags, ink pens, magazines, hairspray, keys, combs, dirt and sand, and pretty much any other item. For the ordinary citizen knowing how to use improvised weapons is far more important than traditional weapons because, as stated in the "rule of thumb", you are far more likely to have these items in your hands when violence happens to you. Unless your well trained and prepared you probably won't have pepper spray in your hands, and there is a very small chance that someone will attack you while you're holding a gun, but you just may have an ink pen in your hand.

After you learn improvised weapons you should learn to use personal weapons. Personal weapons are ready made devices designed and sold for the purpose of self-defense. These items include pepper spray, tactical flashlights, stun guns, retractable batons, personal alarms, knives, and others. I suggest learning to use these before you learn to use guns because there are a lot of places that you can't take guns but you can take pepper spray. You can't take a gun on a plane or into various foreign countries but you can take an ink pen or a tactical flashlight (a tactical flashlight is a small flashlight that shoots a high intensity light that blinds an individual and gives you the opportunity to run away or close distance to them and cause injuries). Most states have laws against various personal weapons so you need to check with your individual state, but simple improvised weapons are legal everywhere.

When all this is done only then do I recommend learning to use firearms BUT I don't recommend buying one just yet. Guns are expensive and it is easy to buy the wrong one. You need to first go to a range and spend some time shooting various guns to see if a gun is right for you. Next you need to decide on exactly how you want to use the gun (do you want to carry the gun or leave it home just for home defense) and speak with a knowledgeable dealer and/or instructor. Most gun dealers are happy to answer your questions and help you select the right gun.

Now that you have a gun you need to get lots and lots of training. Go to your local range or gun store and ask about taking a course to get your CCP (concealed carry permit) and take a course in combat shooting or defensive shooting. Standing in place and shooting a target at the range is one thing but pulling a gun out and shooting an actual person who is trying to seriously injure or kill you is another. You need to learn how to use your gun when you're under attack and actively practice, practice, practice. If you expect to use your gun to defend yourself you need to access your gun underneath your clothing, pull it, disengage the safeties, chamber a round if not already done, point it at your attacker, align the sites with your target, and press the trigger until the gun goes off which will take a good 3 to 6 seconds even for an experienced shooter while all your attacker needs to do is hit, shoot, or stab you which could only take a second.

Guns are great tools and huge responsibilities and only a person truly committed to their own safety should own one otherwise it will probably end up hurting someone or falling into the wrong hands.

The last thing I'll say about guns are that guns are not for self-defense! If you're planning on buying a gun to defend yourself I suggest you don't get one. Used correctly there are only two purposes that guns serve, and those are for killing someone and to practicing killing someone. Having a gun on your hip doesn't keep you safe, all it allows you to do is to kill someone that is trying to hurt you. Guns are a tool for killing and if you carry one it should only be with the intent of killing a criminal otherwise there's a good chance are that when you need to use it you'll fail to pull it, or if you succeed in pulling it there is a good chance that you'll use it to intimidate your attacker instead of lining up the sights and pulling the trigger. This lack of preparedness and failure to properly use the weapon is the reason that over 90% of people who are shot in their own homes are shot with their own guns.

Is it true that most fights end up on the ground?

Yes and no. While it is true that pretty much every fight or violent assault ends up with one or more people lying on the ground, usually unconscious or a least badly beaten, it is not true that most fights turn into wrestling matches.

The statistic that 95% of all fights go to the ground is actually a misquoted finding made in a study preformed by the Los Angels Police Department. They did a study that stated that when they were arresting a suspect and the suspect resisted arrest, 95% of the time they had to put the suspect on the ground in order to cuff them. Not quite the same thing is it?

This false statistics has been spread by the sport fighting community as a sales tactic. By telling everyone that they need to learn to wrestle because "95% of all fights end up on the ground" they enroll more students and of course sell more merchandise such as instructional video tapes and special martial arts uniforms and clothing that won't rip when you wrestle.

What is true is that about 90% of fights and violent assaults last about 5 seconds, start with a right hook, and end when the other guy eats that punch and falls down and bounces his head off the ground. Quite often the trauma caused by the person hitting their head on the ground causes loss of memory , concussions, brain damage, coma, and even death.

The only times real fights or violent assaults end up on the ground is when both people slip and fall, and that's usually caused by them having poor balance.

Another thing that is true is that when people die in fights and violent assaults its quite often because they did go to the ground. Either they slipped and fell or they decided to go to the ground and wrestle and ended up with the other guy, or other guys, just stomping and kicking them until they stopped moving.

Going to the ground or wrestling in a real fight or violent encounter is the last thing that you want to do because when you're on the ground you can only deal with one person at a time. There is a saying that you never know how many people you're fighting until you're fighting them all. You might think you're fighting just one guy, but he may have a few friends hanging around and if he starts to lose they might all jump in to help.

A common tactic that gangs use, both to victimize people and as an initiation rite, is called "the sacrificial lamb". In this technique a group of hoodlums send one person out to confront someone, sometimes a police officer. The person's job it to try to grab a hold of the person and to get him to either grapple standing up or wrestle on the ground. If the sacrificial lamb succeeds in getting the guy to grapple or wrestle then everyone will jump out and they will all attack their victim at once. If the sacrificial lamb isn't successful then he or she is left to fiend for themselves. If you are the intended victim and you fall for the sacrificial lamb and end up trying to put them in a hold or wrestle them on the ground you could be eating shoe leather.

Wrestling is a great sport but it is only appropriate for sport fighting. If you know real self defense techniques then you wouldn't waist your time with wrestling anyway.

Is board breaking really all that great?

By Matthew Schafer
Copyright 2007


When people learn that you practice martial arts they generally ask the same questions and the same comments start. Now I don't really mind when someone who knows nothing about the martial arts starts going on about this or that; what really gets me is when someone who studies, or thinks they study, the martial arts starts rambling asinine comments and questions. This is one of the main reasons I stopped reading "Black Belt" and other martial art magazines.

What got me this time is the propaganda promoted by the martial arts that are into breaking boards, and the people who spout scientific formulas for determining how hard you punch and kick.

These two issues may seem unrelated to the untrained eye but the all make they same mistakes.

First you have the board breaking community which states that board breaking is essential to learning martial arts and that it's a great tool for teaching you how to strike. They also say that since it takes about 8lbs of pressure to break a typical pine board and most of the bones in the body can also be broken with only 8lbs of pressure that board breaking is a "must" if you want to cause "real damage" to the body. The infamous Ashida Kim stated that since it takes 8lbs of pressure to break most bones that you only need to be able to strike with 8lbs of pressure.

Then you have the various formulas people come up with for determining how much force you are punching and kicking with. They add in various numbers and say that someone with X amount of weight who can strike with Y amount of speed can cause M amount of damage to the body when they hit it. If you do a search on the internet you can find all kinds of pages with these formulas on it.

What both of these groups fail to consider is that there is NO real correlation between hitting a board and hitting the human body. You see, a board is brittle and when you hit it, it resists and by resisting it breaks. The human body of the other hand is more like hitting a water balloon. The soft tissues of the body yield to the force and bend and move rather than break.

Firstly, simple Newtonian Physics states that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. So let's say that someone is holding a board for me to break. What is the first thing that I do? I check the board holder's stance because if they're not holding it right the board won't break. Why? If his stance isn't strong enough, isn't physically and geometrically sound, when I hit the board he will yield and the board won't break. My force hits the board and the board holder gets knocked backwards and the force dissipates. If he holds the board correctly the force isn't dissipated by his backward movement and the board, which is brittle and resists, breaks.

There are quite a few lessons to be taken away from this scenario. Consider that the board holder has to stand in a certain way to withstand the force of the blow. Now when you hit a person for real how often will they be standing in a manner to resist your force? Probably never. Chances are they will be standing naturally or they will be up on their toes. In other words, if you walk up to someone and hit them you will knock them backwards simply because they won't be standing correctly to resist the force.

If I punch that board and break it, and then the board holder puts the pieces down and walks towards me and I punch him in the ribs in the exact same manner that I punched the board, he will move backwards and the force will largely dissipate without a break occurring. If I transfer X amount of force with my punch he will cause a large portion to dissipate by moving backwards which will take force away from the ribs. Then if my balance is off and I move backwards too even more force will dissipate instead of going into the ribs.

Next we have to consider the fact that the body responds to trauma by moving the effected area away from the negative stimulus. In the same way that my hand quickly jerks backwards when I touch a hot pan, my body will jerk my ribs backwards if they are hit. The way my body does this is by rotating the injured area away from the negative stimulus, a fist, and moving backwards. You can see this by going up to someone and forcefully poking them in the ribs with your thumb. What will they do? They will bend foreword at the ribs, the point of trauma, rotate that side of the body backwards, and they will cover that area with their hands while taking a small step back. The harder you poke them the more profound the reaction. It should also be noted that the step backwards is an involuntary reaction meant to move the ribs away from the poke and not caused by the force of the impact.

We also have to take into consideration the fact that the body is soft and pliable. Not only does the force of the punch knock the "bad guy" backwards and not only does his body execute a series on involuntary reactions meant to jerk the injured area away from my fist, all of which causes the force to dissipate, but his body actually compresses. That's right! The human body can actually compress about 3 inches before it has to break. So the ribs will actually bend away from my fist and sink into the organs. Much like the reed that weathers the storm by bending and being supple while the mighty oak is broken because it resisted the wind.

If you have ever actually hit someone in the body you have felt your hand sink into them without anything breaking. The body is very soft and will compress about 3 inches before having to break.

So if I hit someone in the ribs and the force of my blow knocks him backwards, he performs involuntary movements to jerk the ribs away from my fist by rotating, bending, and stepping, and then the rib actually compresses rather than breaks, then how is hitting a board anything like hitting the human body? Why do people put such faith in these scientific formulas that, while they are somewhat on track and scientifically sound, ignore the human element? Would you apply the same force equations to driving a truck into a brick wall as you would for driving it into a jello? No. The wall resists, like the board, and the jello yields, like the human body.

That's one of the main reasons why people don't get the "correct" reactions when they hit another person. Everyone is training to break boards and hit heavy bags and ignoring the fact that since the body will yield to dissipate the force you have to hit it harder and penetrate further.